INCEST OFFENDERS VS. MINORS: OTHER FACTORS
These incest offenders vs. minors, like the incest offenders vs. adults, appear to be singularly unresponsive to psychological sexual stimuli. While the majority of both groups (three quarters) responded to the sight or thought of females, very few (about one seventh) responded strongly or frequently. The equivalent control-group figures are 90 per cent and 37 per cent. None responded to males. None reported any sexual arousal from sadomasochistic pictures or stories, and the response to pornography was weak or infrequent. Some of their unresponsiveness to visual and fantasy stimuli is due to their age.
These incest offenders had the third largest proportion of alcoholics: 20 per cent. It will be recalled that the incest offenders vs. children ranked second in this respect. When the alcoholics committed their incest offenses they were drunk in nine out of ten instances. Aside from the large number of alcoholics, the remainder of the proportion of frequent drinkers among the incest offenders vs. minors is modest and quite a few did not drink at all.
The incest offenders vs. minors were, as a group, not gamblers: some 53 per cent, the third largest proportion recorded, had never gambled and very few (8 per cent) had ever gambled seriously.
*148\161\2*
Related Posts:
Tags: Erectile Dysfunction, Men’s Health